![]() |
| [Chapter 6, pages 118-119] |
I decided to take a trip to Panera Bread for some quality free internet time. I read both chapter 6 and 7
from the Technical Communication textbook. Chapter 6 focused on conducting the
research while chapter 7 focused on organizing the information. I really
appreciated that those two chapters were strategically placed together.
What I found interesting is the
section on research questions and methods. I’ve noticed a trend in both
chapters where charts are utilized to clearly organize how to use resources,
although I do not agree with a few items listed. The first would be the use of encyclopedias, because it seems to be obsolete, it’s like telling people to pull out their
cassette tapes and listen to radio recorded music. I guess honoring the fact
that those items still exist is worth the print, meanwhile we can all recycle our old encyclopedias into something more useful, like a handy broom.
Another surprise is that fact that Web
2.0 resources are also listed as a research technique. I find it conflicting
when this chapter later emphasizes to evaluate the information to ensure it is
correct and unbiased. How can one make sure someone’s blog or their social networking
site is deemed as correct and unbiased? Especially when the example provided
was, “How are companies responding to the federal government’s new laws on
health-insurance portability” and Wed 2.0 resources were listed as a source. I do not believe there is an APA format for
quoting someone’s twitter account, well at least not yet.
![]() |
| Appropriate Research Techniques? |


I appreciate your thoughts her on the different research methods in Technical Writing. I hope after class discussion you can see how web 2.0 sources can be useful. They may be biased but they can help gain opinions on topics. Also, there is actually a citation method for Tiwtter. Crazy I know.
ReplyDelete